close
close

SC maintains the HC Madras order in connection with the investigation against the TN police in a sexual assault case at Anna

SC maintains the HC Madras order in connection with the investigation against the TN police in a sexual assault case at Anna

The Supreme Court On Monday, he suspended the ordinance of the Supreme Court in Madras ordering the police in Tamil Nadu conducting the faculty investigation after leakage of the first information report on a sexual assault to a student of the University of Anna, Live law reported.

The composition of BV Nagarathn and Satish Chandra Sharma considered a petition submitted by the Tamil Nadu government to remove the comments made by High Court about the police in this matter. The adjudicating panel upheld and sent a notification to the defendants contained in the petition.

December 28 Supreme Court ordered The state government will pay 25 Lakh Rupia as a compensation to a student who lodged a complaint after the alleged sexual assault on the campus of the University of Anna in Chennai.

The order was issued after a leakage of a complaint to a company based on the complaint, as a result of which the student’s identity was revealed. The police previously placed a copy of the company on the internet, which contained the applicant’s private data, but later deleted it.

The high tribunal stated that the leakage caused the applicant’s “trauma and humiliation”.

The high tribunal was also established by a special investigation team consisting only of women, whose task was to examine the case of sexual assault. He criticized the police commissioner in Chennai and Aruna for alleged improper investigation and asked questions about his behavior at the initial stages of the investigation.

He also expressed a shock because of the language used in the company, stating that this is tantamount to embarrassing the victim, and directed Faculty investigation on leakage.

In the Supreme Court, older lawyers Mukul Rohatgi and Siddharth Luthr, representing the government of Tamil Nadu, submitted on Monday a bench that the deficiencies could not be attributed to Arun, because the company sent to the network and crime tracking systems and crimes blocked personal data.

The network and systems for tracking crime and crime are a centralized internet platform that connects all police stations in India.

Older lawyers assigned the student’s personal data to a technical fault and told the composition that this happened as a result of system migration from older penalty codes to newer.

The state government also wrote to Crime and Criminal Tracking Network and Systems, asking for blocking the details of the company, said Rohatgi, adding that in connection with the leakage another company was brought against unknown people.

Luthra stated that all the connections through which the FIR file could be downloaded were blocked, Live law reported.

Then the adjudicating bench announced that a special investigation team would continue to investigate a sexual assault. However, he left part of the order of the High Tribunal, including paragraph 29 para. 9, which, according to him, burdened a police officer responsibility for deficiencies. Live law.

Paragraph 29 para. 9 mouth order He said: “The defendants 1 and 2 were ordered to conduct a faculty investigation into the FIR leakage and initiate faculty disciplinary proceedings against officials who are all responsible for the deficiencies, neglect and neglect of duties in accordance with the relevant official regulations.”

Nagarathna also noticed that the student had a secondary injury, regardless of the cause of the leak.

According to the accused, the 37-year-old Gnanasekaran was supposed to do so filmed The student and her partner at the university campus, and then threatened to provide the recording to the dean and parents of the couple if they did not meet his demands.

Gnanasekaran allegedly took the applicant to a distant place where he first blackmailed her, and then made a sexual assault, on Monday between 19:45 and 20:20. FIR claims that the accused unlawfully kept the student in custody for 40 minutes.

The incident took place on December 24 at the University Campus Indian reported.