A judge rules that Sean “Diddy” Combs’ accuser cannot sue anonymously | What impact might this have on other cases against mogel music

NEW YORK — A Tennessee woman who claims in a civil lawsuit that Sean “Diddy” Combs sexually assaulted her when she was a 19-year-old college student in Brooklyn cannot pursue her case anonymously, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, accepting the arguments women as “totally justified.” without merit.”

“Simply put, allegations of sexual assault alone are not sufficient to entitle plaintiff to operate under a pseudonym,” Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil wrote in the ruling.

The woman alleged that a security guard took her to a private room at a party hosted by Combs and that the guard told her, “You know what you’re here for.”

Asking for her identity to be hidden, the woman argued that publishing her name would harm her, but ultimately the judge was not convinced.

“Combs has had no contact with the plaintiff for approximately 20 years since the alleged rape, and Combs is currently in custody awaiting trial. Accordingly, counsel did not establish any present threat of physical harm to the plaintiff,” the decision stated.

The judge also said Combs had the right to investigate his accuser and her credibility.

“The Tribunal recognizes that Combs is a public figure and therefore the Claimant is likely to face public scrutiny if she acts on her own behalf. The Court is not indifferent to the potential consequences of such review for each party to the dispute. “However, Plaintiff’s interest in avoiding public scrutiny and even embarrassment does not outweigh the interests of both Combs and the public under the customary and constitutionally embedded assumption of open court proceedings,” the judge said.

The ruling could impact a number of other cases brought by prosecutors who sued Combs under a pseudonym.

The judge noted that other plaintiffs, including Casandra Ventura, chose to use their names in their lawsuits.

Combs denies the allegations against him. In a statement on Monday, his defense lawyers addressed the new allegations against him – including one relating to the alleged sexual assault of a 10-year-old boy – accusing the plaintiff’s counsel of lacking credibility.

“The attorney behind this lawsuit cares about media attention rather than the truth, as is clear from his constant press appearances and 1-800 number,” the statement reads. “As we have said before, Mr. Combs cannot respond to every new publicity stunt, even in response to claims that are apparently ridiculous or patently false.”

Defense attorneys said they and Combs “have full confidence in the facts and the fairness of the judicial process.”

“In court, the truth will prevail: Mr. Combs has never committed sexual assault or trafficked anyone — male or female, adult or minor,” defense attorneys said.

Combs, arrested last month on widespread sex trafficking charges, has pleaded not guilty in the case. As part of his defense, Combs’ lawyers asked the judge to order federal prosecutors to reveal the identities of his accusers.